waldmann
2018-10-04 15:48:21 UTC
Dear Cafe,
what is today's answer to this old question:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9761507/which-pretty-print-library
In particular, I agree with author's:
"The thing that worries me about these [many pretty-printing libraries]
is that many of them have many releases. This implies they've had
features added, bugs fixed, etc. But have they all had the same
bugs fixed?"
Meanwhile, there's https://hackage.haskell.org/package/prettyprinter
"This package solves all these issues, and then some."
(clearly an instance of https://xkcd.com/927/ )
GHC is using pretty-1.1.3.6 ?
- J.W.
what is today's answer to this old question:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9761507/which-pretty-print-library
In particular, I agree with author's:
"The thing that worries me about these [many pretty-printing libraries]
is that many of them have many releases. This implies they've had
features added, bugs fixed, etc. But have they all had the same
bugs fixed?"
Meanwhile, there's https://hackage.haskell.org/package/prettyprinter
"This package solves all these issues, and then some."
(clearly an instance of https://xkcd.com/927/ )
GHC is using pretty-1.1.3.6 ?
- J.W.